Some Details of Planning

Ten trillion dollars of start-up cost is required for developing 2,000 million hectares of unused land with agricultural potential in nearly 100 countries. Per hectare, the start-up cost will be $5,000 on average. This includes irrigation. Almost every land undertaken to be developed will be provided with irrigation. This will free the project from dependence on rain and will give us up to three crops per year, improving also the quality of every crop. Irrigation is necessary to predict crop production. It is necessary also in order to set the time and quantity of exports in advance so that buyers may have a reliable pace for purchasing and selling the produce to their markets. This also helps the financing banks to count on the return of their investment according to schedule.

It is on the basis of providing irrigation that the project becomes productive throughout the year and provides freedom from uncertainties. It is on this basis that we use the phrase: Our project is quite certain, dependable, and therefore risk-free.

We are sure this will give confidence to any experienced financial institution.

Our policy of giving high interest to banks comes from the urgency to attract maximum investment to start the project.

The Project: Removal of Poverty and Creation of World Peace

As long as poverty exists in any part of the world dissatisfaction will remain in world consciousness and world peace will remain fragile. Therefore, removal of poverty is a vital requirement for world peace.

The World Bank records that there are 2.3 billion people earning an average of just over one dollar a day. They require two trillion dollars of additional income per year to come out of extreme poverty. For that our program is to develop organic agriculture in the 2,000 million hectares of unused land with agricultural potential in almost 100 countries. The start-up cost for cultivation of this land is 10 trillion dollars and it will produce a profit of 2 trillion dollars per year (conservatively considered). This additional 2 trillion dollars per year will more than triple the income of the poorest 2.3 billion people of the world.

This plan must be completed within 2-3 years because it will only eradicate the level of extreme poverty of 2.3 billion people. Another two such rises will be necessary to eradicate the poverty of the same population (2.3 billion people) and raise their yearly income from US $450 to $3,000.

Yet another rise like this will be necessary to raise the income of another 3 billion people with a present income of about $2,000 to the level of $3,000.

The second, third and fourth rises will be easier and easier because each rise will have a better base.

Our proposal is not an emotional appeal. Whatever the tender sentiments about poverty removal involved in it, all will be naturally fulfilled, but our proposal is a business proposal, it is hard business, it is lucrative business. The program offers a red carpet to the great leaders of the business world.

Justification of the
Poverty-Removal Program

for the Health, Wealth and Wisdom of the Rich

According to the World Bank there are about one billion people in the world who are not poor. They have an average yearly income of about $27,000.

At least they should begin to eat nutritious food by spending about $400 per person per month. At the moment their average expenditure may be half of that and in the name of food they are eating poison—chemically produced agriculture.

Their expenditure in nutritious food, even if it costs 3-4 times their present expenditure in poisonous food, would be worth it for them.*

$400 per person per month will bring to the project of world peace $4.8 trillion per year.

$4.8 trillion will be the gross income coming to the producers of organic agriculture every year (the yield of these 2000 million hectares).

Expenses will be about $2 trillion (at the rate of one thousand dollars per hectare).

Out of the remaining profit of $2.8 trillion dollars, the first allocation will be repayment of the financiers.

Whatever remains will come to the management for the world peace fund.

* Eating poisonous food, how much do they spend on health care? It is obvious that they spend more than 3-4 times the cost of their present poisonous food. If they spend this on proper food, they will save suffering and will live healthier and longer lives.

This logic is being put forward to say that our poverty-removal program, by development of organic agriculture, has only a win-win position for everyone who involves himself in this; and it answers the question about the size of the project if anyone asks: where will be the market for the additional production of food from 2,000 million ha?